🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and revealed fresh requests had been made by mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader asserting the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his address to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the assaults began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and stays the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be followed."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more united, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."